Re: Why do we restrict our egg testing?
Stephan Richter <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:25:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 27 September 2007 11:06, Jim Fulton wrote: > What I really want is a buildout for a big Zope 3 application, > similar to what we've released in the past. Then, I will often > choose to test a change in something as core as cope.component as a > develop egg in that buildout. I would definitely do that. > (I don't want a meta egg.) Okay, so I think we simply have a clash of naming here. I think we both want the same. So how would you, technically, organize the ZMI application? I would have created an egg, which only has required packages and no code, hence I called it a meta egg. > I'll note that I don't work on "core" components very often so > testing against the Zope 3 app wouldn't be something that I would do > often, but I'll concede that on those rare occasions that I do, > having something like this would be useful. Right, fully agreed. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training