Visually distinct menu choices
Steve Litt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ctwm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Troubleshooters.Com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all,
In a previous email I discussed visually distinct menu choices. What I
mean is that, with the most fleeting possible glance, a person of any
reasonable visual accuity knows whether a menu choice is:
1) A command
2) A submenu without a default
3) A submenu with a default
Here's how I did it in my UMENU CLI text menuing software at
http://troubleshooters.com/projects/umenu2/
===========================================================
UMENU2 menu system (version 1.9.4), (C) 2016 by Steve Litt
NO WARRANTY! Licensed under the GNU GPL Version 3. See the COPYING file.
***** Accounting Menu ***** [sa]
... A: tAx
... B: Book related accounting
E: business Expenses
F: Fulfill Book Orders
G: check for Gnumeric
... H: Health insurance
^ Q: Quit
Your choice please==>
===========================================================
In the preceding, command choices have no prefix, submenu choices are
prefixed by elipses, and "Return to calling menu" choices are prefixed
by a carat. If UMENU2 had the concept of default actions on submenu
choices, I'd probably prefix ones with default actions with either 1 or
3 plus signs. The point is, with the most fleeting possible glance, the
user can tell which choices will perform what types of actions.
Obviously, visual distinctiveness will take on a very different form
with ctwm's GUI menus than with UMENU's text menus, but this example
shows the level of visual distinctiveness I think would be appropriate.
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical
Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition
http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr