Re: [e-users] spurious underlines in terminology

Boris Faure <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.enlightenment.user
Message-ID <20230325143301.cxwu3ygy2iw2rgxx@nabu> 
On 23-03-22 08:53, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Has anyone else seen spurious underlining in terminology v1.13.0?  I've
> seen it rarely when scrolling up and down in the scrollback buffer but
> haven't been able to reproduce it.
> 
> I got https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033159 the
> other day that claims to be able to reproduce it easily (though I
> can't).
> 
> Thanks,
> Ross
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

I've noticed this lately and should be able to easily reproduce it.
I'll try to fix it soon.
  Thanks for the report
-- 
Boris Faure
Pointer Arithmetician
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.