Re: [e-users] imlib2-1.11.1

On 2023-05-04 03:22, Masaru Nomiya wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In the Message;
> 
>    Subject    : Re: [e-users] imlib2-1.11.1
>    Message-ID : <[email protected]>
>    Date & Time: Wed, 3 May 2023 18:05:55 +0200
> 
> [KW] == Kim Woelders <[email protected]> has written:
> 
> [...]
> MN> > As for liby4m, you think that the --with-y4m switch is supposed to be
> MN> > added to the configure script by default, but this is not the case.
>   
> KW>  Hmm.. Looks good to me. Running "configure --help" does list the
> KW>  --without-y4m option.
> 
> If there is a --without-y4m switch, isn't it normal to assume that
> --with-y4m is embedded by default?
> 
Yes, by default, if the requirements are satisfied (liby4m.pc and 
libyuv.pc are found) the y4m.so module should be built.
--without-y4m should disable this and --with-y4m should cause configure 
to fail if the requirements are not satisfied.

> In the case of imlib2-1.11.1, I can compile without --with-y4m
> switch, but liby4m is not embedded.
> 
> To incorporate liby4m, I have to run configure script with --with-y4m
> switch.
> 
Please show the output from running configure, with and without --with-y4m.

/Kim