Re: manpage
Łukasz Andrzejak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.fluxbox.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > hi, > > any reason why there has to be a new and an old manpage. > > if the old one is so inferior that someone had to start a newone > because it is impossible to convert, the old should be removed > (kept by the maintainer) and the new one included. > > it is silly to point people that do "man fluxbox" to a webaddress. > > cheers > The reason for all this trouble is that the page is uder development. The manpage is a effort of the fluxbox community, and as souch it isnt being written by just one person - thou asenchi is the leader of the project. If you feel that you can contribute - let him know - and the page will be done sooner. The fact is that fluxbox is under heavy development - and its hard to keep the documentation up to date when almost every new release gives us new functions. Details on how to contact asenchi are available at www.asench.com - and im sure he'll appreciate any help you can offer. The manpage still has certain sections commented as being obsolete, or just not up to date - if your looking for stuff to help with. Cheers Meltir ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click