Re: moving icewm out of SF?

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:03:56 +0200 (CEST) Adam Pribyl wrote:

> With increasing number of advertisements, loss of credit it would be
> wise to follow other projects and move icewm out of SF.
> 
> however there is not much activity in icewm and uncoordinated move
> may ruin the rest. Is there going to be a desire to do something like
> that? What should then be the target service? How about using
> savannah.gnu.org?

I hope that moving the icewm project will help to revive it.  People
stopped caring about icewm.org because of the lack of activity on it
and the SF cvs repo, so moving could be a good time to re-start.

The bbidulock fork shows there clearly is a desire for icewm to
continue, and it doesn't seem to be a "hostile" fork with its own name
or mailing list (afaics), so perhaps there is hope their changes can be
merged back in future, or alternatively for that to just become the
official source?

Regards,
Laurence

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/