Re: IceWM vs Fluxbox: Future of Ice
Michael <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:46:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.icewm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02/17/2011 12:37 PM, Howard Arons wrote: > I have happily used IceWM for quite a few years now. It seems to me that the prog is slowly going dormant. > > Thus, from the icemw.org page: " "icewm © 1997-2007 Marko Maček (Apologies to the brave and the few who are still active develpoers/maintainers). > > I have just started trying fluxbox, and its similarities to Ice are striking, at least to me. So, my questions: > > 1. Is the development of Ice as dormant as it appears? > > 2. Have others looked at fluxbox as a replacement? Liked it? > > I don't want to start a flame war, I'm curious. > > HaroldWho > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > IceWM-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icewm-user I use them both on different systems and am quite happy. My preference in all is icewm. If needed, menumaker does a great job for menus. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ IceWM-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icewm-user