Re: Xinerama support

Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2007-01-22, Bruce Stephens <bruce+ion-HpBJwjOt1muTY6FTCsQk+9Bc4/[email protected]> wrote:
> So I use two monitors.  Alternatives would be a bigger screen, and
> that would work fine, I expect.  Obviously printing things out, though
> it's handy to have searchable things, and I routinely refer to quite a
> lot of material.  Or switching between workspaces, of course.  It's
> just that much more convenient just to have another monitor.

Actually, it's not so much about the size of the screen. I don't find
19" 4:3 offers anything over 17" 4:3 at the same resolution, or even
a slightly bigger resolution (e.g. 1600x1200 vs. 1280x1024... which would
be more of an enhancement on a 17" screen than between 19" and 17", but not
much of enhancement in either case, as both resolutions are still so poor). 
It's more about the shape. There's horizontally a bit of space left in 
the field of vision after a 4:3 screen, that a widescreen display should
fill. You can comfortably fit two A4 papers on a widescreen display, 
wasting less resources than multihead, that normally will have a lot 
of screen space outside your field of vision.

-- 
Tuomo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.