Not-a-wiki (do we need a "community editable" site?)
Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The past attempts at an Ion wiki set up by various people, have not been huge successes: they've quickly degenerated into awful mishmashes. Therefore I will not be linking to any future attempts: they will fail anyway. The big problem with such a separate wiki seems to be, that there's no maintainer to clean up random edits with little regard for decent layout and style. I personally don't like working through a Web form for bigger edits, so a normal Wiki is also no option for a site that I would maintain. I am also no fan of the usual over-complicated Wiki markup syntaxes. But do we need a "community editable" site for Ion? I am not so sure. There is some demand occasionally, but the amount of contributions to the past wikis has not been that huge. Nevertheless, every contributed FAQ entry and such would ease my workload. As is known, the Ion home page is actually presently generated by ikiwiki, which can be used through various version control systems, not necessitating the use of inferior Web UIs. It would therefore, in theory, be possible to turn it into a proper wiki. However, that would demand servers that I can easily run the software I want on (which is not presently the case). But, you know what, I rather maintain the FAQ than a (virtual) server to maintain... and pay for it. Servers contributed by random people are too unreliable. There's, however, the "poor man's wiki" option left: put the darcs repository of the home page available on the Web, and send contributions by email (with 'darcs send'), and manually apply/moderate them, just like is done with the scripts repository presently. Enabling that would demand me to add kludges to my synchronisation scripts (yuck), and clean up things a bit, so I have not done that yet. (This would enable turning the scripts repository into an ikiwiki site as well, with scripts indices generated by a suitable plugin from descriptions in the source files.) And I won't do that if there isn't any interest in contributing to such a non-wiki. Is there? -- Tuomo