Re: If it is still unclear to someone...
Joerg van den Hoff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:58:58AM +0000, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > On 2007-03-19, Joerg van den Hoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > question: what are the ideas for achieving formatting? should this be written as a troff > > manpage like the real manpage (might be OK)? or what else? > > If it is written in troff/*, then definitely as an additional > 'ion3tutorial' man page. I'd say that would be a reasonable solution, also using troff/ms would not complicate things (it's all the same as with troff/man - just another macro package better suited for larger documents (section handling etc.) the `-man'-macros are posing at tighter frame so to speak: it's obviously the right thing for usual manpages and it's rather obviously not the right thing for lengthy stuff such as the `bash' manpage. I really believe that `-ms' would be better suited for a tutorial/handbook. display would proceed exactly the same: instead of calling `nroff -man some_file' you'd do `nroff -ms some_file'. so it's really a question whether the ms-macros are too complicated to use (they are'nt, maybe easier than '-man'). > > One option might be to use markdown, which generates HTML. That's > what the Ion README, the site, etc. are written in these days. You > can obviously turn that into a text file with e.g. lynx -dump, and which is just that: a text dump. I'd really prefer to have it formatted with troff. postscript-output (and thus pdf via `ps2pdf') is just there and html-output is reasonable, I think. > maybe into PDF too in some automated way. The sucky thing is the > extra dependencies, if it's included in the Ion distribution. (I do would'nt do that. > not like ReST etc.; markdown seems to be the only one of these ASCII > markup language with at least a bit of moderation on the amount of > special syntax.) But maybe having it as a man page would be better... yes. or an ms-document: e.g., I believe the system V UNIX manuals are written with it (or am I wrong?). > > But, no, Mod1+F1 should not be changed from displaying the reference > man page. F12 -> 'tutorial' should suffice -- and displaying this not important. but why do you find it necessary to have to equally easy/short ways to get at the manpage (Mod1+F1 and F1<CR> (I actually use the latter)? > tutorial and how to get to it in the welcome message. joerg