Re: If it is still unclear to someone...

Joerg van den Hoff <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:58:58AM +0000, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> On 2007-03-19, Joerg van den Hoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > question: what are the ideas for achieving formatting? should this be written as a troff
> > manpage like the real manpage (might be OK)? or what else? 
> 
> If it is written in troff/*, then definitely as an additional
> 'ion3tutorial' man page. 
I'd say that would be a reasonable solution, also using troff/ms would
not complicate things (it's all the same as with troff/man - just another
macro package better suited for larger documents (section handling etc.)
the `-man'-macros are posing at tighter frame so to speak: it's obviously the
right thing for usual manpages and it's rather obviously not the right thing for
lengthy stuff such as the `bash' manpage. I really believe that `-ms' would be
better suited  for a tutorial/handbook. display would proceed exactly the same:
instead of calling `nroff -man some_file' you'd do `nroff -ms some_file'. so
it's really a question whether the ms-macros are too complicated to use (they
are'nt, maybe easier than '-man').
> 
> One option might be to use markdown, which generates HTML. That's
> what the Ion README, the site, etc. are written in these days. You
> can obviously turn that into a text file with e.g. lynx -dump, and
which  is just that: a text dump. I'd really prefer to have it formatted
with troff. postscript-output (and thus pdf via `ps2pdf') is just there and 
html-output is reasonable, I think.
> maybe into PDF too in some automated way. The sucky thing is the
> extra dependencies, if it's included in the Ion distribution. (I do
would'nt do that.
> not like ReST etc.; markdown seems to be the only one of these ASCII
> markup language with at least a bit of moderation on the amount of
> special syntax.) But maybe having it as a man page would be better...
yes. or an ms-document: e.g., I believe the system V UNIX manuals are written with 
it (or am I wrong?).
> 
> But, no, Mod1+F1 should not be changed from displaying the reference
> man page. F12 -> 'tutorial' should suffice -- and displaying this
not important. but why do you find it necessary to have to equally easy/short ways
to get at the manpage (Mod1+F1 and F1<CR> (I actually use the latter)?
> tutorial and how to get to it in the welcome message.

joerg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.