Re: Dodgy function pointer casts

On 2007-04-25, Ben Hutchings <ben-/[email protected]> wrote:
> Is this change likely to be acceptable, Tuomo?

Umm... any kind of OO shit in C absolutely positively depends on
function pointer casts. Or are you going to wrap all the _hundreds_
of pseudo-dynamic functions? Over my dead body.

More uglier is the case of function pointers to data pointers used
somewhere in the code. I haven't checked if there's a way around it,
but then again, any sane architechture will have matching function 
and data pointers. (Functions should be nothing special! They should
be data like everything else! Stuff of the first class!)

-- 
Tuomo