Re: ion-3rc-09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.tar.gz
"Alexander Shishkin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/12/07, Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2007-05-12, Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > At least, autoconf deals with cross-compilation while most of those > > who think that they can write decent makefiles fail to do so. > > If cross-compilation needs more than changing the compiler used > and/or its flags, and library/include paths, that system is fucked > up. (Alternatively a chroot jail should be used.) How can you tell if malloc(0) in target's C library returns zero or behaves like glibc's, for example? What with 1500 of such little conditional settings? Defining all those in a makefile is what I prefer to call being fucked up. Does ion3 cross-compile at all, btw? Does luac produce 100% architecture-independent bytecode? > > Any of this fails to attract my attention in debian, for example. > > Debian is a complex fucked up mess. I'm not a poet, but it still sucks less. Again, the only major concerns of mine (with debian or not) is ion's breakage. You've taken to talk a lot of fud recently, btw. > > Except, probably the case when I discovered that ion3 no longer does > > xinerama due to you being somehow upset with xinerama API. > > Not the API -- there isn't much of it; just that the whole thing > is a pointless [1] exercise in mutually incompatible extensions, > which combined with ICCCM incompleteness in the nested WM window > department, makes it impossible to get working Right. Given this, Oh right, now with xinerama being supported in ion for so many years, you figured out that problem. However, being a mere luser in the context of window management, I don't care since I've never hit any problem with that and now with xinerama support removed my feelings are hurt. > the state of the planet, and the general distaste I have for the > consumerist culture, I'm not going to waste my time supporting Now you sound like those sinister FOSS people from your previous mails and blog entries. Being asshole towards not-completely-dumb users for no apparent reason (or should I say: a problem that may arise in a galaxy far-far away is not really a convincing reason?). > and helping anyone enlarging their penises with multihead > configurations. Want to talk about penises? And yes, here in Russia we're totally buried in consumerism. My BMW X5, for instance, has a platinum steering wheel. > Convenient or not, I doubt you have a justifiable (to me, not the > FOSS herd and other conspicious consumers) need for a multihead > setup. I can walk my way to New Zealand sooner than you accept the probability of the fact that you're not 100% right sometimes, let along the xinerama thing. I don't feel like wasting my breath on this any more. -- I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.