Re: transparent_background doesn't work

"Samuel Baldwin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11/3/07, Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> RTFM. And besides, transparency is a stupid distraction, and
> the pseudo-transparency that you're probably referring to, an
> ugly kludge that doesn't quite work. If you're part of the "oooh!
> shiny!" herd that absolutely wants such anti-readability effects,
> I recommend Eterm, or something else that lets you have a terminal
> background image (possibly using the root window background image
> set with Esetroot), instead of touching crap that uses the
> pseudo-transparency kludge with a kilometre long stick.

Indeed-- most backgrounds don't provide good readability unless you
tint them. Backgrounds are mostly just eyecandy and a waste of time.

However, whenever I feel an urge to have eyecandy (this generally
wears off in a day), I run "urxvt -tr -fg gray +sb". That's the
pseudo-transparency kludge though. Generally "xterm -fg gray -bg
black" is as shiny as you should get.

-- 
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin

Shardz's Igloo: shardz.homelinux.net

Registered Linux User #410639
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.