Re: ion3 license

On 2007-12-17, Joerg van den Hoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> a) ion3 has been removed from `macports' which is the MacOSX
> package management system. 

Good. 

> I  think  it really would be a wise and nice thing to do and
> draw a line at demanding some unambigous info in the package
> that  it's none of your buiseness if an old version does not
> work  as  expected.  enforcing  "under   cover"   names   is
> ridiculous.

This distros are mostly composed of ridiculuous fuckwits and 
dickheads -- ex school bullies who can only package and corrupt
others' software -- if even that -- and not actually write new
software, let alone something that wouldn't be a clone (the whole
FOSS movement is incapable of that). They consider it "unreasonable"
and impossible to add prominent notices that I will have nothing 
to do with their obsolete and modified shit. Renaming is the 
alternative to that.

> otherwise  this  seems  a sure strategy to finish `ion3' off
> outside of a _very_ small group. I'm sure you would'nt  care
> but need you enforce such a thing?

I don't want to have anything to do with the typical specimen of 
the FOSS herd. I rather deal with a handful of nice and intelligent
people. 

-- 
Tuomo