Re: Desktop apps.

Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2008-01-08, Nick Murdoch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Presuming you want a graphical client rather than a terminal browser,  
> Opera is pretty nice for keybindings... an awful lot can be set in the  
> advanced preferences. Tab only cycles through form elements, and  
> Shift+arrows lets you select links, similarly to how elinks does it.

I find that Opera is actually _more_ keyboard-usable than the typical
text-mode browsers. A lot of the time I just use inline search to go to
a link. Spatial navigation is also nice, although that could be improved^1.
With a lot of search keywords (^l to location bar, "wp foobar" for wikipedia
search, etc.), as well as address completion, there's little need to touch 
the mouse for browsing well-designed Web pages (i.e. those that have not 
seen a Web Designer). Opera also supports configuration the bindings,
though a rather awkward WIMPy interface, which is still better than
Firefox's "install an extension and hunt for javascript snippets all
over the Web for even remapping existing bindings".


^1 I'd like there to be some indication where it will take
you, because it isn't always clear in complex layouts, and there
should also be header navigation, like with the linear, w/s. I'd
also like it not to jump page, when the next option isn't visible,
but rather scroll, possibly not moving anywhere, until a target
is visible. Among other possible improvements.)

-- 
Tuomo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.