Re: ion3 packaging advice

"Paulo Matias" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ion.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Per the license, it is ok if takes conscious user effort to disable
> the post-install script,

The only way to disable the post-install script file (besides removing
the .INSTALL file that is created inside the package tarball) would be
to pass the --noscriptlet option to the pacman package manager. The
pacman man page says:

 "--noscriptlet   If an install scriptlet exists, do not execute it.
Do not use this unless you know what you are doing."

> and the message is displayed prominently,
> i.e. not hidden among long install logs in batch installs. (Perhaps
> a 'read' would fix that, although annoying...)

If today was Sep 25, the output when installing ion-3-20080825 would
look as follows:

bash-3.2# date 09251522
Thu Sep 25 15:22:00 BRT 2008
bash-3.2# pacman -U ion-3-20080825-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
loading package data...
checking dependencies...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts
[#######################] 100%
(1/1) upgrading ion-3
[#######################] 100%
PLEASE NOTE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This package is older than 28 days, so it may not be the latest version
of Ion-3. The author does not support old and/or obsoleted versions.
Please send any bug reports to the package maintainer, not the author.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


These install messages are considered to be very important in
archlinux, and will never be hidden from the user by the package
manager.

>
> Other than that, I'd obviously prefer more intelligent notifications
[snip]
> Obviously, such "call home" is somewhat annoying.. although much
> less than the application itself doing it at times other than the
> installation.. and it would be better if the information was
> obtained from the same source as the package. Distributors could
> keep a database of the information for all packages...)

Problems could arrise if the user is currently not connected to the
Internet when installing the package, too.


Thanks a lot for your reviews and advise. Do you confirm the packages,
if packaged as I described here, are freely redistributable according
to the trademark license?


Thanks and best regards,

Paulo Matias
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.