Re: Using Openbox with Wayland
Ranjan Maitra <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:47:29 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.openbox |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mailbox Ignored |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dana, That is what I read (on Fedora's webpage about wayland) also. Does that mean that Anthony's suggestion will eventually stop working? Thanks also to Anthony for the detailed instructions. I will try them out for now. Best wishes, Ranjan On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:00:47 -0500 Dana Jansens <[email protected]> wrote: > There is currently a transitional period where you can run X under wayland, > in which you can of course run a WM. One day most apps will be ported to > wayland and everyone will run them natively with the wayland compositor as > the WM. At least this is my understanding of where things are/going. > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Anthony Thyssen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I am currently using openbox on fedora 25 ... no problems, > > Though it switched to a XOrg server (on tty2) for my session, rather than > > run under Wayland (on tty1) > > > > I run openbox from the 'orginal' scripted Xsession/XInitrc setup. > > Which I launch by installing the package "xorg-x11-xinit-session" > > That lets me select a "User Script" session from the login screen (on tty1) > > > > > > I don't know the mechanics of how it does this switch, but it worked > > 'out-of-the-box', mostly as all my normal packages was installed. > > > > I installed Fedora 25 into a new 'root' partition while running fedora 22. > > As such I had all the packages I wanted installed even before I first boot > > the system! > > This was the first time I did it this way and after some experimenting it > > worked great. > > My notes on how to install (not upgrade) a new release, while running a > > old release is in > > http://www.ict.griffith.edu.au/anthony/info/usage/fedora_ > > on_new_partition.txt > > > > WARNING: That update worked for EXT4 but I am missing something with grub > > for handling a XFS root partitions. If anyone know what I missed please > > contact me. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Jim Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >> > >> Thanks again to both Dana and Ian! This will be quite a problem for me > >> to > >> leave Fedora since I have spent over 13 years on it, and have been a > >> contributor also. But I will ask on Fedora's mailing list about what the > >> options are, since I also do not want to get tied down by an unnecessary > >> DE. > >> > >> I too have avoided using a DE. Every time I try one it seems to just get > >> in > >> the way. But the world is headed in that direction. > >> > >> I've had good luck with Arch. It's modular enough that you can add just > >> Xorg, add a WM if you want, or add any of the popular DEs if you want. I > >> suspect you can still do this with Fedora; you could last time I tried. > >> But > >> it's probably easier with Arch. I have even installed Ubuntu with just > >> Xorg > >> and Openbox, and that wasn't too hard. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> openbox mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openbox mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox > > -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. _______________________________________________ openbox mailing list [email protected] http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox