Re: status of openbox
[email protected] Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:19:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.openbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0455500420107789595== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4487C342C0CE084CCDC422B0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------4487C342C0CE084CCDC422B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Answering myself: While I still would like to hear opinions about this, it seems that the thread mentioned below was just FUD... [email protected] wrote: > Hello, > I've been using openbox for ages and have no reasons to complain. > However, I have recently seen posts like this > <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/anyone-interested-in-taking-over-openbox-4175618383/> > where people claim that openbox is "dead" and "unmaintained". > This isn't the first time I'm hearing something like this. Also please > note that these claims are unrelated to wayland changes. > > Also note further down: "I asked in their forum about the development, > not the actual maintainers, just some peeps hanging in the channel and > they said it was no longer active." - I don't even know what that > means, openbox doesn't have a forum? > > I know that the 2 main developers regularly answer questions here, > which in my opinion kindof proves that openbox is not "dead"; > What is your (Mikael Magnusson, Dana Jansens) take on these rumours? > It would be nice to reply to these claims with some sort of > authoritative answer. > > TIA, > > o. > > > _______________________________________________ > openbox mailing list > [email protected] > http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox --------------4487C342C0CE084CCDC422B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#333333" bgcolor="#FFFFCC"> Answering myself:<br> While I still would like to hear opinions about this, it seems that the thread mentioned below was just FUD...<br> <br> <br> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:8cd4b404-ec30-3e56-9238-b6e93593e186-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org">Hello, <br> I've been using openbox for ages and have no reasons to complain. <br> However, I have recently seen posts like this <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/anyone-interested-in-taking-over-openbox-4175618383/"><https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/anyone-interested-in-taking-over-openbox-4175618383/></a> where people claim that openbox is "dead" and "unmaintained". <br> This isn't the first time I'm hearing something like this. Also please note that these claims are unrelated to wayland changes. <br> <br> Also note further down: "I asked in their forum about the development, not the actual maintainers, just some peeps hanging in the channel and they said it was no longer active." - I don't even know what that means, openbox doesn't have a forum? <br> <br> I know that the 2 main developers regularly answer questions here, which in my opinion kindof proves that openbox is not "dead"; <br> What is your (Mikael Magnusson, Dana Jansens) take on these rumours? <br> It would be nice to reply to these claims with some sort of authoritative answer. <br> <br> TIA, <br> <br> o. <br> <br> <br> _______________________________________________ <br> openbox mailing list <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox">http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/openbox</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------4487C342C0CE084CCDC422B0-- --===============0455500420107789595== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kb3BlbmJveCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKb3BlbmJveEBpY2N1bHVzLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vaWNjdWx1cy5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9vcGVuYm94 --===============0455500420107789595==--