Re: [PATCH] disallow duplicate group names

Shawn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ratpoison.devel
Message-ID <874p3akcsy.fsf@juicebox.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Ali Gholami Rudi <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Shawn,
>
> On Oct 17 2008 12:12 +0330, Shawn wrote:
>> Ali Gholami Rudi <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> +  if (groups_get_group_by_name (ARG_STRING (0)))
>>> +  if (groups_get_group_by_name (ARG_STRING (0)))
>>> +  if (groups_get_group_by_name (ARG_STRING (0)))
>>
>>>  rp_group *groups_find_group_by_name (char *s);
>>> +rp_group *groups_get_group_by_name (char *s);
>>
>> Doesn't groups_find_group_by_name work for these cases?
>
> No.  It finds the first group that starts with the given prefix (it
> uses str_comp()).  I've tried adding an "exact" parameter to
> groups_find_group_by_name(), but IMO it wasn't any cleaner.

Ahh, I see.

> Maybe group_find_group_by_name() can be changed to find the exact
> match? AFAICT, that usually means only an extra tab key: "gselect def"
> no longer works for switching to the "default" group (also gselect
> won't be case insensitive anymore).  Doing so will also solve the
> situation when there are two groups in which the name of one groups is
> the prefix of the other.  For instance when "a" and "ab" groups exist,
> it is impossible to switch to "a" group when "ab" has a lower group
> number (when not using group number in gselect, of course).

Give groups_find_group_by_name an argument: exact_match. If its
non-zero then then do an exact match. if its 0 then do what it
currently does. update the existing code, patch up your code, and
bipass the secondary manifold using a 0.04 micron phase discriminator.

-Shawn
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.