Re: [PATCH 3/6] Disable sfdump if there is no xrandr support.
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Nov 2016 16:15:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ratpoison.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mathieu OTHACEHE <[email protected]> writes: > Without xrandr support, sfdump command has no interest. I think this is headed in the wrong direction. There is no reason to disable this command when we can easily deal with the single available screen. Same thing for your sselect and srestore diffs. Moreover, those introduce additional uses of xrandr-specific function in generic code. I'd rather have a generic abstraction for available screens. I have to think more about this. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE _______________________________________________ Ratpoison-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ratpoison-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 800 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYOacYAAoJEA36dK4VJOfuT8QP/0rICbtmF++7TcGYcWWvwHpe TpNqKRKX2DaQNNljK+L+SpbduUAjQrjgwBGOMYyvgiMsqk3NSrYDs4evu6eNunLR Uk62bf1Q8gJG6K/AFTZ187/SiXaBINXslxzh+/+0+B1Lj9hopCrVSXPxDPCiwPKG WzKkQ8ImulF0AAPOO3Rc8j/uo9maSDb+u9g5hAE+ofsu5JyDqZrRwSQYLODdMb3p K4nYYKaJ6X1LqK+hrFsEpcs1/kMxWLqDyY7ToJ/isdIFMoec5+1wq9rJULl8Xbl4 mMcUHly4AER6e4VZMFoP3/dheWYdI143Ik0K8Ck4o65U3axNatK8AxxYZSUiUAvF wGrAZXkr/z9S9z+QpynpDsy9btQK0A2hhRnRxe8bVS21G5mTlxkvBlefFG0b1i15 ALEWICuaLJT3ZgsIr13C6Tfznjj3xkFy/wN0JDkWx3/EOLhN7r2orXAesEbukFyn +BQ9qupqLgDCL7GnbwUZWFU4aYoJys+D4NawDPpc4cXKYHVf/c8OEdwCQggrDadE q9fWnGzV/ERHJbS49Wftnsm7l9Wt1Nx5gIEKpeMcfWzXX/LdptUnEMJEHkcG15Z9 s3l2aNYbpHn5FezgQXG44C8+j6jErtwt3sid+padb9194uCURIGYMkhssqWsoznw PN9Ebr3O95E2WFBUL2N7 =+/dq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----