Re: [STUMP] Making StumpWM more modular

That sounds great.  I'll start looking into it over the next few days.




On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) <[email protected]> wrote:

> But you could apt-get install sbcl and clisp on travis-ci.
>
> There is also a cl-travis[1] project provides template for travis
> integration.
>
> [1] https://github.com/luismbo/cl-travis
>
> Kanru
>
> Mehul Sanghvi <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > travis-ci does not provide SBCL or CLISP support.
> >
> > I'd be interested to help with this, as CI is what I do on a daily basis.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Quentin Stievenart <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I think that this is generally a good idea. Splitting up stumpwm
> >> architecture in multiple, smaller packages that are still part of
> >> stumpwm is certainly a good idea.
> >>
> >> However, I see a minor problem when splitting packages into a
> >> different projects (as for the keysyms): we should be careful that it
> >> won't create compatibility problems if ever the library interface is
> >> changed and stumpwm's source is not updated fast enough.
> >>
> >> I guess that keeping stumpwm related libraries under the stumpwm
> >> organization is the way to go to avoid this. Having a buildbot (or
> >> travis-ci) being run on every commit of stumpwm and it's libraries
> >> could also help.
> >>
> >> On 17 September 2014 16:36, David Bjergaard <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > There's been some discussion on the issue tracker about repackaging
> some
> >> > of the code in stumpwm to be more modular.  Some pieces are useful to
> >> > other projects in the CL ecosystem, and others have a semantic
> >> > difference from the rest of the core of stumpwm.
> >> >
> >> > In my short time as package maintainer, I've always appreciated the
> >> > input from the community, so if you have strong opinions please give
> >> > them here.
> >> >
> >> > You can catch up on some details of the discussion here:
> >> > https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/pull/146
> >> > https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/pull/125
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >     Dave
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> >>
>



-- 
Mehul N. Sanghvi
email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel