Re: [STUMP] Drop the generation of stumpwm.texi

"Diogo F. S. Ramos" <[email protected]> writes:

>>> Reducing the complexity was not my only concern, like I stated before,
>>> but thank you for the care.
>> Can you elaborate, I know that it may feel like I'm not listening, but I
>> feel like I'm missing a deeper point.
>
> Oh, I didn't feel like you were not listening.  I think we just disagree
> about it.
>
> I say we drop this.
No problem! Please feel free to raise any other issues here, or let us
know about any other problems you encounter.  I know you wrote a few
days ago about developing a module, I hope to see what it is sometime
soon.

Cheers,

    Dave