Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM supports?
[email protected] (Diogo F. S. Ramos)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.stumpwm.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 15 January 2015 at 17:41, David Bjergaard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp. >> This probably won't happen mainly to avoid making headaches for package >> maintainers. > > Well you don't *have* to get them from quicklisp, it's just the > easiest way for an end user building from source to deal with a bunch > of dependencies. I would have thought this was less of a problem for > package maintainers in that you just need to define the list once, but > I'm not a package maintainer so I won't press the point. Well, packages need to be available in the repository. Not only packages and their dependencies, but also the correct versions of them.