[STUMP] Paulownia, aka StumpWM 2.0.0

Michael Raskin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.stumpwm.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>4. I think the support for floats should be dropped initially and re-worked in a
>   different way.  If we're going to have floats, I envision being able to
>   toggle windows between being tiled and floating on top of the tiles.  In a
>   sense making the float group sit on top of the tiled group and being able to
>   move windows between the two as needed.  This would ideally be done
>   automagically for dialog boxes that often are placed in awkward positions
>   when tiled.

If we discuss changing the grup logic, maybe we will end up 
reconsidering the granularity of group choice?

I.e., is it worth supporting per-monitor groups? Is it worth supporting
multiple «pseudo-monitors» inside a single physical display? What _is_
a group, what is tied to it (windows has a single group?) and what are
its immutable characteristics (if we have per-monitor groups, what to do
with frame splits, if there are any)? Is a floating group always 
entire-workspace? Is a floating group tied to underlying tiling group?

My setup via frame tagging is most close to 4 no-permanent-splits
«groups» inside a single physical display, and one or four more when
I attach an external display to my notebook.

Should I describe more details about its usage as a use case or is it 
too weird to consider at the current stage?




_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.