Re: [STUMP] Paulownia, aka StumpWM 2.0.0

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Raskin <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> My setup via frame tagging is most close to 4 no-permanent-splits
> >> «groups» inside a single physical display, and one or four more when
> >> I attach an external display to my notebook.
> >>
> >
> >Is this similar to having one "sticky" group that's always on the one same
> >head (= display), and have all other displays have changing groups?
> >That's one feature I'd really like. IRC/e-mail/etc always open on one
> >monitor, then the other content changes depending on which group I have
> >active.
>
> Yes, just a bit more generic (and works on top of current StumpWM).
>
> One of them is for my xterm-based modeline, one for notifications, one
> is often IM+email (very like your sticky group).
>
> Sometimes I switch to code+view (LaTeX+PDF or backend+website) usage of
> the two large areas.
>
>
Right.

I both like the current way, where the group is at top-level, and the other
way where I'd have something like nested groups.

To be clear on what I mean, this is hopefully a better explanation:

Given
A, B = monitors
[A], [B] = the frame on an empty head/monitor, i.e. with no splitted
frames, on monitors A and B.
{[A] [B]} = group containing said frames
{X}+ = group that's stuck to a head

Then {[A] [B]} is what we have now, and { {[A]}+ {[B]} } is what I'd like
to have. Then a command to unstick a group to a head, which causes a merge
of {[A]} + {[B]} into {[A] [B]}.

- Micke

_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel