Re: [STUMP] StumpWM 1.0.0 Released!
Javier Olaechea <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:49:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.stumpwm.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFVS=zC_CDB=MZwjggQ3Q0XBt20GrDau0hHjE=wLtYmb7tVjZw@mail.gmail.com> |
One can still use the mailing list to report bugs and submit code contributions. On Jan 25, 2017 14:54, "Jean Louis" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:07:38PM -0500, David Bjergaard wrote: > > > It would be nice that I don't need any Github account and that > > > development is on some non-proprietary software. > > You're welcome to fork the 1.0 release and continue developing it using > whatever > > VCS you prefer. You're also welcome to send critical patches to the 1.0 > release > > to this mailing list for the benefit of others. You may even leverage > git for > > some of these features: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9630774/how-to-make- > pull-requests-without-a-github-account > > > > I don't know what you mean by "proprietary software" stuwmpwm itself is > GPL2, > > github supports free software even if its a SaaS, as mentioned above you > can > > contribute without supporting or buying into github. CLISP and SBCL have > > different licenses, but the benefits of SBCL outweigh the benefits of > CLISP on > > every other count. Further, neither CLISP or SBCL are proprietary > software. > > Yes, I know. I referred to Github, not the other software. I like that > Stumpwm is hosted at nongnu or gnu, whatever. Mailing list is open to > everybody. But bug reporting on Github is not. > > I support free software. And often I support programmers with some > money contributions. > > How can I appreciate the Github business model earning moneys on free > software, while not making Github free software? Read: > http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html > -- like "The GPL is not focused on freedom. It's too long. Too many > restrictions", or "Notice that everything we keep closed has specific > business value that could be compromised by giving it away to our > competitors. -- source: Tom Preston-Werner's" from > http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html > > Here is one analysis of Github: > https://mikegerwitz.com/about/githubbub > > Free software project shall not be on Github. There is Gitlab and > there are many other possibilities. Finally, why not host oneself? > Even VPS hosting today is so inexpensive. > > Jean > > _______________________________________________ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel