Re: DIME Use Case?
Mitch Denny <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Apr 2002 18:44:31 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dime |
|---|---|
| Organization | MitchDenny |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patrik, PF> if you want And I think that quote from your e-mail is the key point here, MIME is like a fully featured VCR with all the trimmings it gives you everything you could want, at the cost of some simplicity. Despite the availability of these features, some developers just want to press play, pause and stop. Should developers require the capabilities of MIME encoding then they will most definately use it. DIME represents a simpler alternative which allows the developer to get the job done without having to factor in all the MIME bits. If making a something simpler isn't an argument for a technology then I don't know what is. ---------------------------------------- - Mitch Denny - [email protected] - +61 (414) 610-141 - -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of DIME technology [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström Sent: Sunday, 14 April 2002 15:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DIME] DIME Use Case? --On 2002-04-14 07.54 +1000 Mitch Denny <[email protected]> wrote: > Not necessarily true, there is not a functional link between the two > mechanisms. Where MIME finds itself mainly in use in SMTP, NNTP and > HTTP communications, DIME is enabled for use in a more direct manner > (on the wire). This is wrong. MIME is created for the same thing DIME is. Like many other people say beside Erik and myself, with MIME you can have a profile which need binary transport (including a content-length tagging if you want) and voila, you have what I claim is so close to DIME that DIME is not needed. Also, regarding basic transport, look at the blocks architecture, it is exactly what DIME want to be (I claim) but with more features which solves other problems you still will have with DIME, like multiplexing over the same connection. I do not (still) understand what DIME is to be used for, because I have not seen any arguments what so ever why DIME is needed. And, yes, I have been in discussions with among others Henrik for many months now, even before this mailing list was set up. Patrik