Re: MIME vs. DIME vs. ...
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:43:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Larry Masinter <[email protected]> writes: > I think the issues are: footprint of code, reliability, > consistency. MIME with content-length isn't MIME; > MIME multipart is difficult to create 'reliably' > (because of the difficulty of choosing separators that > are guaranteed to not appear in the body), It's not particularly difficult to create separators that are guaranteed not to appear in the message body, simply use a cryptographically secure PRNG to generate a suitably large random number (160-bits should be plenty). -Ekr [0] I often see people argue that probabilistically unique values aren't "guaranteed" to be unique. I don't find this argument convincing. A probability of 2^-80 is good enough for essentially any purpose. -- [Eric Rescorla [email protected]] http://www.rtfm.com/