Re: DIME Use Case?
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:21:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon Fell <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:16:00 -0700, in soap you wrote: > >So, you're saying that it's worth inventing an entirely new > >packaging protocol to avoid writing the relatively trivial > >amount of code required to handle MIME boundaries? > > No, I'm saying its worth it, to remove the runtime penalties > associated with it. [both on the generation and parsing side] I'm not convinced that these penalties are at all substantial. Do you have measurements that show that they are? However, even if they were, surely it would be simpler to define a new "chunked" Content-Transfer-Encoding for MIME than to define an entirely new protocol. -Ekr -- [Eric Rescorla [email protected]] http://www.rtfm.com/