Re: DIME Use Case?
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Apr 2002 06:31:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <49887907.1018852260@localhost> |
--On 2002-04-14 14.11 -0700 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, but I have asked the "why DIME" for a year now, and I >> still get back the same (wrong) comparison with MIME. >> >> I am still waiting for an answer. > > With all due respect, I think an answer has been provided on several > occasions. DIME is not a replacement for MIME, and it is not a protocol. > It is a simple wrapper that allows one to choose whether one wants to use > XML (such as SOAP), MIME, or something else entirely. My point is that I have not got the description on why DIME would be simpler than a profile of MIME. Just the claim. Yes, you and I have spent hours on the phone, including multipart teleconferences, and I have been talking with others aswell. Noone have been able to say what is simpler. paf