Re: MIME vs. DIME vs. ...

Patrik,

Ah, this was was a bad choice of words, instead of
"over" think "instead of". Apologies if this has caused
you any confusion.

Basically, no I would not run DIME over MIME, frankly
I don't see the point, this scenario would only introduce
additional complexity while adding no extra value.

----------------------------------------
- Mitch Denny
- [email protected]
- +61 (414) 610-141
-

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of DIME technology [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m
Sent: Monday, 15 April 2002 22:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DIME] MIME vs. DIME vs. ...


--On 2002-04-15 17.57 +1000 Mitch Denny <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this scenario I would probably look at both TCP and UDP as viable=20
> options for transmission of the DIME encoded packet, it would depend=20
> 100% on the specifics of the application.

But, you said:

--On 2002-04-15 09.02 +1000 Mitch Denny <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some folks like me will consider DIME over MIME,
> thats just a fact, no point getting up tight about it.

Now you are changing your mind.

Exactly these handwaving things makes it completely impossible to
discuss what DIME should be used for -- if anything.

   paf