Re: Unmanaged resources in a static class

Simon Robinson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advanced
Message-ID <LISTSERV%[email protected]>
Thanks for the replies everyone.  Static reference to an instance does
sound on the surface to be the easiest solution. I have one doubt though:
It's occurred to me to wonder whether finalizers are guaranteed to be
executed when the app exits? They are executed when a garbage collection
happens but that's not the same thing. Does .NET do a garbage collection
on app exit or does it just rely on Windows freeing up everything?  If it
doesn't then keeping a static reference presumably won't make any
difference.

Ta

Simon

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:33:14 -0700, Greg Young <[email protected]>
wrote:

>why not keep a static reference to an instance of the class instead of
>using a static class?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Greg

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.