Re: Binary comparison of files

Eddie Lascu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advanced
Organization IBI Group
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Geoff,

Are you working on the same project as me? It's like you are doing exactly
what I need. I agree 100% with your comments. Hashing is not the best
approach because it will require the processing of the whole file.

Thanks bunches,
Eddie



-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Binary comparison of files

> If all you need to know is that the files are different; I would use a 
> hash.  CRC32 is fairly fast.  For more reliability you can use a 
> cryptographic hash.
> 
> If you want to know what the differences are; the performance would 
> depend on how you plan on processing the differences.

Surely a hash will require processing all the file before returning its
result?  So if the first byte is different, it's still going to read in all
of both files and calculate both hashes.

Why not just go for a simpler approach using buffered IO.  You read two
chunks (one chunk from each file) into byte buffers then do a byte-by-byte
comparison, breaking the loop at the first byte that doesn't match.

Since they're small files, you could probably just do a ReadAllBytes instead
of reading into buffers.  That would give you the length of both, so you
could check that first, giving you another shortcut to a fast negative.

Here's a similar method that uses assertions instead of failure conditions
that should show you what I mean:

        public static void Compare (string referenceFilename, string
testFilename)
        {
            byte[] referenceFile = File.ReadAllBytes (referenceFilename);
            byte[] testFile = File.ReadAllBytes (testFilename);
            Assert.AreEqual (testFile.Length, referenceFile.Length, "Files
are of different lengths.  Reference file is {0} bytes, test file is {1}
bytes.", referenceFile.Length, testFile.Length);
            for (int counter = 0; counter < referenceFile.Length; counter++)
            {
                if (referenceFile [counter] != testFile [counter])
                {
                    Assert.Fail ("Files do not match (at position " +
counter + " - [before '" + indicatorString + "']).");
                }
            }

            return;
        }

I'm pretty sure this'll be faster than using a hash (although I'd love to
see a comparison of timings).

You might be able to make the method faster by looking at how the data is
read in.

Good luck,

			Geoff

===================================
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives

===================================
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.