Re: Reflection and code replacement.
Davy J <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:48:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advanced |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks I'll take a look at that, Dave. On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > Look at some of the mocking frameworks. They support this, as much as > I don't like the concept this is an ideal situation to use > http://www.typemock.com/ > > Greg > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Davy J <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently writing unit tests against an existing website which I'm > not > > able to modify the source of. > > > > I've run into a problem where I need to test a method that is trying to > > insert a record into the database. > > > > Is there anyway of doing reflection / emit to replace the save method of > the > > db class with either an anoymous delegate or copy the class definition > and > > override the class implementations so that nothing happens? > > > > > > sort of: > > > > DbInstance.Save = delegate(BusinessObject bo){ > > return true; > > } > > > > =================================== > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives > > > > > > -- > It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought > without accepting it. > > =================================== > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives > =================================== View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives