Re: Reflection and code replacement.

We use rhino mocks! it just can't handle the complexity of the code. It's
going to be refactored at some point so I'm not that worried at the moment.

Dave.


On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Bobby Heid <[email protected]> wrote:

> Davy,
>
> We use TypeMock (www.typemock.com) at work.  With this tool, we can mock
> the
> db calls (or any other object/method).  Check it out.
>
> Bobby
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Davy J
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reflection and code replacement.
>
> That's the problem I can't use a database in the unit tests, the project is
> continously built in about four different scenarios, it's extreamly
> dificult
> to test it without running the ASP.NET page.
>
> I guess I can just stop the test at the point of the first exception and
> test that the exception returned is the one expected. But it seams to be a
> poor mans unit test then.
>
> Dave.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:10 PM, John Warner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Can't answer your question. An alternate approach if I understand you
> > correctly (and a good chance I don't) when testing the inserts use 'odd'
> > values so the DBA at the back end can just run a delete query to clear
> > 'you' out when the test cycle is done. In case the reflection option does
> > not pan out...
> >
> > John Warner
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Davy J
> > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:59 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Reflection and code replacement.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm currently writing unit tests against an existing website which I'm
> > not
> > > able to modify the source of.
> > >
> > > I've run into a problem where I need to test a method that is trying to
> > > insert a record into the database.
> > >
> > > Is there anyway of doing reflection / emit to replace the save method
> of
> > the
> > > db class with either an anoymous delegate or copy the class definition
> > and
> > > override the class implementations so that nothing happens?
> > >
> > >
> > > sort of:
> > >
> > >    DbInstance.Save = delegate(BusinessObject bo){
> > >        return true;
> > >    }
> > >
> > > ===================================
> > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
> >
> > ===================================
> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
> >
>
> ===================================
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
>
> ===================================
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
>

===================================
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives