Re: Online activity

Paul Cowan <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:31:18 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advanced
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> Currently does your application know what record I'm editing? If so how?

You select records from a list.

The only time concurrency is flagged when the save button is clicked.

I would like to know before the saving of the record that a user is working
on this record.

Cheers

Paul Cowan

Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)

http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/



2009/10/11 John Warner <[email protected]>

> Currently does your application know what record I'm editing? If so how?
> (I'm client with browser)
>
> John Warner
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
> > Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:44 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Online activity
> >
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> > I am using NHibernate and I am already using the Versioning support in
> > there.
> >
> > This still needs the user to press the save button and potentially get
> all
> > the way to the end of adding all the detail to find out that it has been
> > altered by another user.
> >
> > I think what i am looking for is the ability to tell the user sooner
> rather
> > than later that the record is being worked on by somebody else.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Paul Cowan
> >
> > Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)
> >
> > http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/10/11 Markus Zywitza <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Use optimistic locking. The best bet is using a version column, that
> holds
> > > either a DateTime or an integer counter. In the update compare the
> current
> > > version with the version that has been read when displaying the record
> to
> > > the user. It is then important to check whether the update really
> changed
> > > the record by inspecting the record count.
> > > NHibernate does the same with it's optimistic locking. You can look
> into
> > > NHibernate's documentation and source code for a more in-depth
> > explanation
> > > of the optimistic locking with version columns.
> > >
> > > -Markus
> > >
> > > 2009/10/11 Paul Cowan <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am working on an application where different users will process
> > > different
> > > > database records off a web page.
> > > >
> > > > They will select different records from a grid on a web page and
> then
> > > > complete the details before saving.
> > > >
> > > > My question resolves around how I can stop 2 different users
> accessing
> > > the
> > > > same record at the same time.
> > > >
> > > > I could have a flag in place that signifies that the record is being
> > > worked
> > > > on but there are edge cases surrounding this approach.
> > > >
> > > > My worry is that a user might start processing a record and then for
> > > > whatever reason just finish the browser session without actually
> > > finishing
> > > > the record and the flag will remain as being processed.
> > > >
> > > > I am sure this is quite a common use case.  Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Paul Cowan
> > > >
> > > > Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland)
> > > >
> > > > http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > ===================================
> > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > > > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
> > > >
> > >
> > > ===================================
> > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
> > >
> >
> > ===================================
> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
>
> ===================================
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives
>

===================================
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives