Re: Something more serious than Obsolete.

Thanks, Adam and Chris.
P

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Adam Sills" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:12 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Something more serious than Obsolete.

> [Obsolete( "message", true )]
>
> Will provide a compiler error instead of a warning.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed
> language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
> Obiefuna
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 5:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [DOTNET-CLR] Something more serious than Obsolete.
>
> Hi,
> Hope everyone is having a happy new year so far!
>
> I intend to block compile-time access to some inherited methods. My
> preference would be a method Attribute that throws a compile-time error.
> Does anyone know of any?
>
> ----------------------------
> [Obsolete("This method is invalid for an empty collection.")]
> protected  override void InsertItem(int index, TDomain item)
> {
>     throw new InvalidOperationException(
>        "This method is invalid for an empty collection.");
> }
> ---------------------------
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor  http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
>

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com