Re: Derive concrete type from generic type.
"Nassar, Anthony" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agreed, and well said. -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Per Bolmstedt Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:04 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Derive concrete type from generic type. Nassar, Anthony:: > You might want to look into the C5 collections library, which has much > better support for custom collections. C5 doesn't seem to overlap very well with .NET 3.5, on the conceptual level (doing stuff with LINQ is probably usually preferable to doing it with C5's custom methods) as well as the implementational level (the Fun delegates, HashSet, etc), so unless Mono compatibility was important, I'd wait for C6. Switching to a third-party library to get around the problems of inheritance coupling seems a bit rash, and I can't see how C5 solves the potential variance issues. Or maybe I'm being too judgmental? =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com