Re: Consuming your own events.

of-course it doesn't you forgot to inherit A in B.
--Daniel

________________________________________
From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed              language [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sébastien Lorion [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Consuming your own events.

On 1/30/08, James Geall <[email protected]> wrote:
> <quote>I personally have to disagree with your main point which is
> "overridable is
> bad because people can omit to call the base method". Well then, the same
> applies to constructors.
> </quote>
> I am not sure this is 100% right.  I think (certainly in c#) that the
> compiler will call the default constructor on the base class if there is
> one, and fail to compile if there is not.
> I do not know if this holds true for other languages or if it's a CLR
> feature.

The following console app prints "in B ctor". A ctor is not called
when creating B.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;

namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            B b = new B();

            Console.ReadLine();
        }
    }

    class A
    {
        public A()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("in A ctor");
        }
    }

    class B
    {
        public B()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("in B ctor");
        }
    }
}

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com