Re: Consuming your own events.
Sebastien Lambla <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:19:12 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just like we moved away from unmanaged to managed, and to IoC (after all, the new keyword works well enough, doesn't it?), leaving On and adopting Raise / Handle seems justifiable. I find the argument of adoption to be accurate but limitating. -- SerialSeb http://serialseb.blogspot.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed > language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter > Ritchie > Sent: 31 January 2008 15:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Consuming your own events. > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:19:43 -0500, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Lorion?= > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >My point is that maybe (I stress maybe) WPF could have made it so that > >its architecture respect the established pattern of OnXXX. Is that > >pattern perfect? no. But then, is there any perfect pattern? But > >that's the one we got, it's a fundamental one, and now people need to > >learn yet another way of doing things *again*. > > Yes, at some point you have to accept certain things not because they > are > perfect but because they are ubiquitous. Just about any > tool/practice/pattern is flawed in a certain way; the art is using it > correctly despite its flaws. > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com