Re: Consuming your own events.

Sebastien Lambla <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:19:12 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just like we moved away from unmanaged to managed, and to IoC (after all,
the new keyword works well enough, doesn't it?), leaving On and adopting
Raise / Handle seems justifiable. I find the argument of adoption to be
accurate but limitating.

--
SerialSeb
http://serialseb.blogspot.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed
> language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
> Ritchie
> Sent: 31 January 2008 15:24
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Consuming your own events.
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:19:43 -0500, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Lorion?=
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >My point is that maybe (I stress maybe) WPF could have made it so that
> >its architecture respect the established pattern of OnXXX. Is that
> >pattern perfect? no. But then, is there any perfect pattern? But
> >that's the one we got, it's a fundamental one, and now people need to
> >learn yet another way of doing things *again*.
>
> Yes, at some point you have to accept certain things not because they
> are
> perfect but because they are ubiquitous.  Just about any
> tool/practice/pattern is flawed in a certain way; the art is using it
> correctly despite its flaws.
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR  http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com