Managed vs Unmanaged for Memory Economy
Brady Kelly <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:26:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm having a discussion with a friend on this subject, and while I know full well that unmanaged is more economical, I'd like to know of any case studies for similar scenarios that actually use managed code successfully. Here are some excerpts from his description of their system: > We sent out a total of 4,161,835 eMarketing emails in January > > This week we sent out: > Emails - 754,851 > SMSes - 252,279 > But what uses all the memory? Calculations for the emails, queuing, > writing PDF's? Two things, building and sending. To build the email, all the correct substitutions must be made, statements generated from data files, etc. Common to have several big builds going on at once. Once it's built, it's stored in a batch file. The mail server queues and sends the messages out. Possible to have multiple simultaneous SMTP sessions going on at the same time. Brady, our outgoing bandwidth utilisation per month is in the terabyte range! When you're pushing that much data, you quickly run into the limits... =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com