Re: StringBuilder Extension: IsQuotedBy

Sébastien Lorion <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:15:31 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Creating lots of short lived objects in a short time provoke many Gen1
which artificially promotes other objects to Gen2 or Gen3. You then
get what Rico Mariani calls a mid-life crisis.

http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2003/12/04/41281.aspx

So allocating memory in .NET is fast, but if you abuse it, then you
create yourself a big problem.

Sébastien

On 2/14/08, Per Bolmstedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:28:29 +0100, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  > creating objects is indeed a bit expensive in .NET,
>
>
> I've heard the exact opposite. And I find this hard to relate to as a
>  general statement... could you put this in perspective? Is it more expensive
>  in .NET than on comparable platforms, or is it more expensive in .NET than
>  comparable implementations that do not create objects?
>
>
>  ===================================
>  This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(R)  http://www.develop.com
>
>  View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
>


-- 
Sébastien
www.sebastienlorion.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com