Re: StringBuilder Extension: IsQuotedBy
Chris Tavares <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:00:26 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003301c86f3b$dc52d9f0$94f88dd0$@com> |
My last perf test I did showed plan object creation at less than 100 nanoseconds per instance on my box (2.13 GHz Pentium M). Creating 5,000,000 instances took less than a 10th of a second. I don't think object creation in .NET is expensive at all. -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Per Bolmstedt Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 5:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] StringBuilder Extension: IsQuotedBy On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:28:29 +0100, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > creating objects is indeed a bit expensive in .NET, I've heard the exact opposite. And I find this hard to relate to as a general statement... could you put this in perspective? Is it more expensive in .NET than on comparable platforms, or is it more expensive in .NET than comparable implementations that do not create objects? =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com