Re: StringBuilder Extension: IsQuotedBy
Per Bolmstedt <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:17:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:35:39 +0100, Daniel Petersson <[email protected]> wrote: > in my first post, I clearly stated that the choice (regex vs > hand-coded) depended on the develment task, sadly a lot people > didn't notice this and therefore a lot of post are slightly or > completely of topic. No, the reason it went OT for me is that the nonchalant statement "object creation in .NET is expensive" has been used at least twice to support design strategies, and subsequently gone unchallenged. And because I find throwaway generalizations like these harmful, I can't find it within myself to let them pass. And as elaboration has shown, there is *nothing* to back up this claim; one poster has rephrased it as "object creation is expensive just like everything is expensive" (tautology), another as "object creation is expensive if you do it in a way that leads to expensive consequences" (non-sequitur), etc. I've seen senior developers make strict guidelines forbidding certain things on tautologies and non-sequiturs like these, so I have first-hand experience of their dangers. "Thread-OT but not list-OT" is always OK, right? =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorĀ® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com