Re: Funny loop with post-increment.
silky <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:22:42 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 19, 2008 10:18 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > > > In other places where break is used, it does something: it breaks > > > out of the block it is in, though in switch/case it's unnecessary. > > > > it is necessary given the above. > > No, it's not. Yes it is. What if I want to do nothing in case 1, print in case 2, and do something in the default case? How do I do it without break? > switch(n){ > case 1: > case 2: > Console.WriteLine("a"); > case 3: > Console.WriteLine("b"); > } > > would be perfectly fine. As there's no fall through after code blocks, > the block of case 1/2 won't end up in the block of case 3. However 'break' is > required after the code of case 2. > > Anyway, it's never going to change :) > > > FB -- http://lets.coozi.com.au/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com