Re: Why properties cannot be used as ref or out arguments
Dean Cleaver <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:11 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4543A775711185429E59B18055D41674232261@sxslakl004.xceptionsoftware.com> |
Heh - cool - but as this website is entirely C#, I can't see Erlang being of use, but the concept is interesting :) Dino -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Kelly Sent: Monday, 10 March 2008 23:58 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Why properties cannot be used as ref or out arguments Dean Cleaver <[email protected]> wrote: > Problem is my variables are of differing types... not that I can tell > from your code snippet, but It seems they are expected to be the same > type? Erlang is dynamically typed. However, more generally, tuples are structurally typed, and each field can have a separate type - that's what makes them different to arrays. In statically typed functional languages, where tuples are common, the type of e.g. ("Barry", "Kelly") would be (String, String). > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of development on the .NET platform using any managed > language [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Skeet > Sent: Monday, 10 March 2008 22:56 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CLR] Why properties cannot be used as ref or out > arguments >=20 > Dean Cleaver wrote: > > Yeah - getting my head around it now. Sadly, it's not VB I wanted it > > for. > > > > Is a shame- looks like I will have to declare 2 variables, pass them > in, > > and then analyse the returned responses to achieve what I want - takes > > the "ideal" 1 line call to about 7 or 8 at least - was trying to > > encapsulate a call, but it might not be feasible. >=20 > Sounds like an argument for tuple return types: >=20 > (FirstNameProperty, LastNameProperty) =3D SplitName(FullName); >=20 > :) >=20 > (Can you tell I've been learning Erlang? ;) >=20 > I've no idea how much work is required either in terms of language > design or CLR modifications to support this - I suspect it would be > feasible in "language only" but a lot more elegant with CLR integration. >=20 > Jon >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com >=20 > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com >=20 > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com -- Barry --=20 http://barrkel.blogspot.com/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This list is hosted by DevelopMentor=AE http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com