Re: Instance vs Static + Option
Nick Robinson <[email protected]> Sat, 17 May 2008 05:20:38 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You mean something like ConfigProvider? Does this class provide CRUD style = behaviour onto a =22config table=22, or does it do something very specific = with a config table? I dont know whether Provider is the right term, but = the fact it makes the class feel more dedicated is good. Of course, it = could still be a helper, and thats ok. Nick. > -----Original Message----- > From: brady=40chasesoftware.co.za > Sent: Sat, 17 May 2008 11:35:58 +0200 > To: dotnet-clr=40discuss.develop.com > Subject: Re: =5BDOTNET-CLR=5D Instance vs Static + Option >=20 >> There isnt enough context to go off, but I would personally prefer an >> instance over statics. I have found that as soon as I even hint at the >> word =22helper=22 it polarizes my subsequent thoughts on how to design >> something. Rarely in my experience do I see a helper without statics >> (a recent project was more helper than anything else), so as soon as I >> use the term, I immediately think it will probably have statics. >>=20 >> Nick. >=20 > Maybe Provider would me more apt than helper then. Provider sounds more > dedicated. >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com >=20 > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > http://discuss.develop.com ____________________________________________________________ Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click. Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out=21 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This list is hosted by DevelopMentor=AE http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com