Re: Instance vs Static + Option

Nick Robinson <[email protected]> Sat, 17 May 2008 05:20:38 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.clr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You mean something like ConfigProvider? Does this class provide CRUD style =
behaviour onto a =22config table=22, or does it do something very specific =
with a config table? I dont know whether Provider is the right term, but =
the fact it makes the class feel more dedicated is good.  Of course, it =
could still be a helper, and thats ok.

Nick.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: brady=40chasesoftware.co.za
> Sent: Sat, 17 May 2008 11:35:58 +0200
> To: dotnet-clr=40discuss.develop.com
> Subject: Re: =5BDOTNET-CLR=5D Instance vs Static + Option
>=20
>> There isnt enough context to go off, but I would personally prefer an
>> instance over statics.  I have found that as soon as I even hint at the
>> word =22helper=22 it polarizes my subsequent thoughts on how to design
>> something.  Rarely in my experience do I see a helper without statics
>> (a recent project was more helper than anything else), so as soon as I
>> use the term, I immediately think it will probably have statics.
>>=20
>> Nick.
>=20
> Maybe Provider would me more apt than helper then.  Provider sounds more
> dedicated.
>=20
> =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor.  http://www.develop.com
>=20
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com

____________________________________________________________
Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages
Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click.
Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out=21

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor=AE  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com