Re: C# 3.0 partial methods and automatic properties

Stoyan Damov <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:34:38 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.cx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Again? Like I've been difficult ever? :P

I wouldn't have said anything if you haven't mentioned "wrist-friendly way".

On 11/11/06, Marc Brooks <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Stoyan Damov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The issue you bring up is a VERY valid one... you get the ability to
> > > change the method from the trivial stub to an actual method that does
> > > something for free (from recompile of clients). This allows you to
> > > standardize on the pattern of always having property accessors in a
> > > wrist-friendly way.
> >
> > Wow, what a terrific feature! You can record a macro[1] (ctrl-shift-r)
> > that does that in a few seconds.
>
> Stoyan is being difficult again... we're not talking about an IDE
> feature here...

Cheers

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com