Re: ASP.NET Session Expiration

Bryan Batchelder <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Copying DLLs to your production server will have the same effect.

I have some largeish websites setup using StateServer and haven't
noticed any detrimental effect...and they are all using the same SQL
Server (which is running the Session State Service).

I am sure you'll be fine - well as sure as one can be without seeing the
details of your site and how you use session state - but it sounds
pretty simple.

--b

Bryan Batchelder 
eBusiness Consultant 
ConnectWise, Inc. 
813-935-7100 x 425



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Houck, Rob [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] ASP.NET Session Expiration
> 
> 
> Bryan,
> 
> Good point.
> 
>  We're going live with the application in a couple of weeks, 
> and it currently hosts between 200-250 concurrent users (with 
> spikes to 500). I didn't want to be in a situation where 
> updating the production software would cause everyone to 
> loose their session.. :)
> 
> Or.. Am I seeing something that only would occur on our 
> development servers (caused by the *build* operation) and 
> would not happen in production (caused by copying new DLL's 
> to the production box)?
> 
> Rob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Batchelder [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] ASP.NET Session Expiration
> 
> 
> I haven't noticed any detrimental affects from switching to 
> StateServer vs. InProc.
> 
> You can always go back to InProc on your production machine, though.
> 
> --b
> 
> Bryan Batchelder 
> eBusiness Consultant 
> ConnectWise, Inc. 
> 813-935-7100 x 425 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Houck, Rob [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:08 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [DOTNET] ASP.NET Session Expiration
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > In doing some development, I noticed that every time I do a 
> build on 
> > our development server, any attached users loose their current 
> > session. I'm
> > (obviously) using the default inproc session management.
> > 
> > I believe I can simply use out of process session management to 
> > correct this behavior. Is this true? I manage a very small 
> amount of 
> > information in session (six integer values), so will out of process 
> > session management really have much of an impact on the 
> performance of 
> > my application?
> > 
> > 
> > Rob
> > 
> > ==============================================================
> > ==========
> > 
> > Robert L. Houck, Jr.            
> > Northshore Computer Solutions        Chance favors the 
> prepared mind. 
> > http://www.northshores.com/                     - Louis Pasteur 
> > 419.242.3696 ext. 401           
> > ==============================================================
> > ==========
> > 
> > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from 
> > DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at 
> > http://discuss.develop.com.
> > 
> 
> You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe 
> from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at 
> http://discuss.develop.com.
> 
> You can read messages from the 
> DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to 
> other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
> 

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.