Re: STA to MTA

Don't mix STA with meaning single threaded.  You can have a STA assembly using multi-threading.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Colbert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] STA to MTA


I guess this means I cannot use async calls offered by
MulticastDelegate.BeginInvoke, EndInvoke since these are handled by a CLR
threadpool presumably created as MTA?

-----Original Message-----
From: franklin gray [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] STA to MTA


From what I understand, the managed assemblies have to be STA for it to
interop with COM objects.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Colbert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [DOTNET] STA to MTA


Hello interop experts,

This is a repost from last week - reworded to be (hopefully) simpler...

How can I marshal a COM interface pointer created in an unmanaged STA to a
managed MTA thread? In othre words, what is the managed moral equivilent of
CoMarshalInterThreadInterfaceInStream or the GIT?

TIA,

-Frank Colbert

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.